Lyme Evidence Sheet

Reviewed 2026-07-24

Can one test or a list of bands be a final Lyme answer?

One screening test or a band list is not the same as a final two-step interpretation. Ask whether the full recommended sequence was completed and how the laboratory reported the overall result.

What the evidence says

  • CDC describes two-step antibody testing, with a second test after a positive or equivocal first test.
  • CDC/APHL guidance explains the reporting language used for the overall testing sequence.

What this can tell you

  • Whether a report contains a screening result or individual band wording.
  • What additional report language to request.

What this cannot tell you

  • A final interpretation from one isolated detail.
  • Whether an incomplete report confirms or rules out Lyme.

A useful question for your clinician

Was complete standard or modified two-tier testing performed, and what is the laboratory’s final interpretation?
Sources (2)
  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ‘Testing and Diagnosis for Lyme Disease.’ https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/diagnosis-testing/index.html. Accessed July 24, 2026. Open source ↗
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Association of Public Health Laboratories. ‘Suggested Reporting Language, Interpretation and Guidance Regarding Lyme Disease Serologic Test Results.’ 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/media/pdfs/2024/05/Suggested-Reporting-Language-Interpretation-and-Guidance-Regarding-Lyme-Disease-Serologic-Test-Results.pdf. Open source ↗